The Mike Smith Database James Stanfield

Since documentation of authentic Mike Smith artwork is so very difficult to find through Google, January Blog has taken it upon itself to provide The Mike Smith Database. This is a public service and free of charge.

Right now the database is tiny, but, since we believe Mike Smith to be among the best artists on Earth, we expect it to grow rapidly. If this database should ever meet with Mike Smith's disapproval, we will remove it from the web at his request. Until then send all images of Mike Smith artworks to wroistanfield@yahoo.com. Thank you.

Love the Container Keith Gladysz



I made my first trip to Dia:Beacon over last weekend. The space and location was so amazing that a good portion of the work was eclipsed by the former factory space on the Hudson River. I had to decide to be heady or head out in the sun to enjoy the surrounding property. Even though the sun won I saw the whole collection and some really great work.

Richard Serra’s Torqued Series hit home with me. I loved walking in them, sensing the swelling, subtle movement of solid matter. On a geek note, they reminded me of the Jawa’s huge sandcrawlers, in almost static motion.

Also, Robert Smithson’s room was of interest. Sand and mirrors that somehow transform. Bruce Nauman’s ‘South American Circle’ was wonderful and displayed with proper eeriness in the basement.

There was also a Warhol exhibit that displayed a lot of his knick-knacks. Not too exciting to me. I’m wondering if I’d make a special trip again to Dia:beacon. If there were a particular show I'm sure I would. But having been there once seems enough to last me for a little while.

Mike Smith - Pro Sk8boarder James Stanfield



Went to the Met to escape the heat. No air conditioner has Mayumi and I trying to spend the daylight hours in stores and museums. The met was amazing as usual – was also tiring as usual.

Found myself thinking of these three people all day:

Mike Smith. Have you ever tried to google his name? You’ll never find him among all the others. If you know his work that’s really very fitting. (He makes great stuff about failure.) I want to know what he’s up to lately. I would like to nominate Mike Smith for a Jblog award. Maybe, most creeped-out artwork (2005) for Take Off Your Pants! He has a co-conspirator that goes by the name Joshua White.

Neo Rauch. Wanted to complain about this work, but am too tired and hot to do that. I’m sure that is just as well.

Andy Coolquitt. If you have not seen his house in Austin, Texas – or the 20 pages in Nest Magazine devoted to it - you can watch this video made for the public station in Austin.

Oh, and I think the image at the top of this post is a poster for one of Andy's shows.

$5 James Stanfield



I picked this up over at Nicole Eisenman's blog. Will go if, sadly, I can pull together a spare $5.

Wednesday June 8th, 7pm,
Laughing Matters
An evening with presentations by philosopher Simon Critchley, artist Luke Murphy, and a screening of Samuel Beckett's Film.
The Kitchen, 512 West 19th Street,
$5 Advanced ticket purchase strongly recommended (212 255 5793 ext 11)

"...Ever since Aristotle's lost book on comedy, laughter has been a conundrum in Western thought that has puzzled not only philosophers but also scientists, sociologists, and comedians. Laughing Matters draws on a number of sources to explore why people laugh. Beginning with a presentation by artist Luke Murphy utilizing simple Powerpoint graphs to "clarify" the relationship between laughter and other emotional states, the evening continues with a screening of Samuel Beckett's short film from 1965, in which an aging Buster Keaton seems to have a pathological aversion to allowing his face to be seen by the other protagonists or even the camera. Beckett's 20-minute film will provide the background for philosopher Simon Critchley to explore the three philosophical traditions that attempt to explain why humans enjoy laughing".

Complex Mayumi Hirano



I’m not sure if this Mori is related to Moriko Mori, but I went to check out the Mori Art Museum. Mr. Mori owns a major portion of Tokyo. He has recently built a large complex that has several tall office buildings as well as apartments for the wealthy people that work in the offices. I heard that most of the space houses technology companies, but I’m not 100% certain about that. However, I can tell that the companies that rent space here are elite.

The fifty-four-story Mori Tower is part of the complex. You can get a clear view of the city of Tokyo from the top. The Mori Art Museum is on one of the top floors. The building feels like a permanent futuristic exposition. The tower staff wear odd space-age uniforms; they're kind of ugly (the uniforms, not the staff). You pay 1500 yen to get into the museum (slightly less than $15).

It’s just like going to the Empire State building – you wait in a long line before you can get into the elevator. There the staff control how many visitors are packed into the elevator. The ride is great because the ceiling changes color as you ride up - much like a James Turrell hallway I've seen at the MFA in Houston, Texas.

There are two galleries. One housed an exhibit of Giorgio Armani products while the other was showing two different art exhibitions. I skipped the fashion and went for the art. The gallery is very clean and has a nice wooden floor, but they had taped off all artworks so that visitors could not get too close. In some cases typed notes, actually placed on the art, asked visitors not to touch the works.

One show brought in contemporary works from East Asian countries and the other show focused on storytelling in contemporary artwork. It was interesting that the two exhibitions were separated. The only Asian artists represented in the storytelling show were from Japan; all other artists were from the West. This positioning of the Japanese artists with more famous western artists, while roping off the other Asian work into its own category, felt like segregation. I thought the works in the other exhibit were also using storytelling traditions. Storytelling is such a wide-open topic that all the work in both exhibitions could have easily existed as the one storytelling show.

Owe Not To Paint James Stanfield



One of the first ways I was able to get a foothold on Joseph Beuys’s output was to think that just after WWII all German artists must have felt that they should stop making art. Art, so easily associated with patronage and appreciation, must have seemed an unreasonable gesture when your nation had been torn apart, and the people around you starved. This must have felt double when you realized that you had some role in the deaths of so many others. This must have felt triple when you understood how much the rest of the world was demonizing you. No one wanted to hear your voice anymore. You owed it to the world not to make art.

I understood Joseph Beuys’s practice as an illustration of how one survives such a time. How one can become transformed and reborn, and even while doing this still manage to take some of the important things from an unpopular heritage into the future. I saw – and still see – Beuys as an energizer of students, a political voice for those who should not speak, and a guide.

As America is an advanced capitalist system and since art in New York is a big part of that, and since painting is the object that provides the most easily packaged experience of art, I have chosen painting as a whipping boy. I’m not saying that I don’t appreciate painting, because I have really fallen for a few of them, but today I would be hard pressed to find a painting that is politically subversive. The ones I see are all politically benign. If you’re unable to stay outside the realm of the collector – no painting is supposed to - and equally unable to embed such a critique, you are merely a participant in a money-is-our-politics culture. This is a bananas capitalist governance that has demanded we destroy millions of lives in every pocket of the globe.

The same can be said for most of the sculpture I’ve seen here. Much of it leans solely toward pleasure. Most of it refuses to complicate its political use.

I’m not saying we should not be paid for our artwork, and I’m not saying that we should shun all collectors. I am saying that it is important to look at the forces we are currently governed under and find our artwork's eventual destination in all of that.

There is wealth in New York - wealth like I’ve never witnessed before. Artists want a slice. That’s no different from what anyone else wants, but I would like to remind artists that we are still the voices that slide up and down the economic ladder. We talk to the insanely rich, the mildly wealthy, the building owner, the homeowner, the average plebeian, the poorer prole, and, sometimes, even the destitute. Often we do all this talking in one day. We possess tools, not the least of which is beauty, that aid us in producing things that slip into all these people’s lives.

At a time when what money wants it gets, it becomes important to remember that we can’t beat our insane version of capitalism with artwork, but we can complicate the cycle of exploitation. Until our leadership creates a nation that puts some ideal above money, I owe not to paint.

Doggy Dancing Keith Gladysz


How could I not laugh out loud at this man who creates gladiator performances with his pet dog? It's a bit ridiculous. But check it out, there's an audience watching this. And it's pretty sizeable. Dog show attendees and figure skating fans rejoice, you have a new artform. It turns out there's an international underground human/dog performance scene happening.

La Societe du Spectacle, Guy Debord Mary Jeys




Hello January Blog Readers, here's my book report:

I read this book in the French, so pardon me if this becomes a little oblique. My French to English translation is perhaps, eh how we say? ne pas bien. No really, I read the translation by Donald Nicholson-Smith. It is Guy Debord approved. I have to say, this is some good theory- makin' me think. Brain hurt. There were some tough times during the chapters Time and History and Negation and Consumption in the Cultural Sphere. Mostly though, this stuff is hot property. Hot chapters included Separation Perfected, Unity and Division Within Appearances, and Ideology in Material Form.

It's surprisingly, about the spectacle. Of our society. There is so much in here, it's hard for me to recap. But, let's give it a try anyway:
- The Spectacle makes human beings defined by having not being. So, we are Human Havings.
- The Spectacle alienates us from everything and everyone. Spectacle is lonely.
- "The Spectacle is capital accumulated to the point where it becomes image" Think Paris Hilton.

The book goes on and on like this some better some worse. There's a handy chapter in there about the proletariat. The Proletariat as Subject and Representation goes into all the different incarnations of communism and socialism that all eventually fell to their knees in front of the Super-Strong Capitalist Market system. I like the Communist stuff. Back when I read Orwell's 1984, I remember thinking that it would be really cool if we all had to wear gray overalls.

A friend recently said to me that he didn't think this book applied to him. My response is "Bull Honkery", if you live right now, in our ever expanding society, it applies to you. Read it to find out how much. But you don't have to take MY word for it.